๐Ÿšš on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.8/5 from 841+ reviews
Outdoorโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Muk Luks Socks

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.8 out of 5(841 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$7.5
$12.5
Sale
โœ“ on the house dispatch on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

not ever been worn. Size S/M 5-7. They seem prefer they would fit my size which is an 8. Will ship with care!

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
express shipment

โ†ฉ๏ธ
easy-to-use Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Muk Luks Socks

at no time been worn. Size S/M 5-7. They seem prefer they would fit my size which is an 8. Will ship with care!

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Outdoor products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1094776

Category: Outdoor > Garden Protective Gear > Gardening Gloves

Original Price:$12.5 USD

Sale Price:$7.5 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

๐Ÿšš dispatch & Returns

โœ“ gratis dispatch on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.8
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 4583 reviews
JA
Joshua Allen โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Milwaukee, WI
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
superb Muk Luks Socks
Overall experience with the Muk Luks Socks has been positive.
21 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Pittsburgh, PA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
cherish it!
After a few days, the Muk Luks Socks fits my needs and it works for me.
9 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Pittsburgh, PA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
superb purchase
The Muk Luks Socks performs well.
19 people found this helpful​
MR
Mike Reynolds
7 months ago ยท Las Vegas, NV
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Exactly what I needed
The Muk Luks Socks didnโ€™t disappoint.
5 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young โœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago ยท San Antonio, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
splendid quality
After a few days, the Muk Luks Socks fits my needs and it works for me. distribution was normal.
33 people found this helpful