🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 642+ reviews
Outdoorβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

6" blooming hoya cagayanensis

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.3 out of 5(642 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$65
$108.33
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Instagram balmy_breeze_tropicals thank you much

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift delivery
↩️
hassle-at no charge Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

6" blooming hoya cagayanensis

Instagram balmy_breeze_tropicals thank you much

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Outdoor products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1421109

Category: Outdoor > Live Plants > Hanging Plants

Original Price:$108.33 USD

Sale Price:$65 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6303 reviews
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
superb value for money​
The 6" blooming hoya cagayanensis doesn’t disappoint, but doesn’t surprise either.
6 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
The 6" blooming hoya cagayanensis feels solid enough. No issues so far.
6 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Seattle, WA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
remarkably happy
Everything about this 6" blooming hoya cagayanensis is good.
26 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceeded expectations
After several use, the 6" blooming hoya cagayanensis feels okay and it meets expectations.
32 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Memphis, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding!
For the price, the 6" blooming hoya cagayanensis works well enough so it’s acceptable.
34 people found this helpful